Interview with Carlos Gould for a University of California Sustainability event

Besides playing around with ๐ถโ„Ž๐‘Ž๐‘ก ๐บ๐‘ƒ๐‘‡ ๐‘ฅ ๐‘†๐‘ก๐‘ข๐‘‘๐‘–๐‘œ ๐บโ„Ž๐‘–๐‘๐‘™๐‘– last week I interviewed Carlos Gould for a University of California Sustainability event.

๐„๐œ๐ฎ๐š๐๐จ๐ซ + ๐ˆ๐ง๐๐ข๐š

Ecuador offers a positive story in energy transition. Through decades of subsidizing LPG, Ecuador has been able to replace the use of wood with gas almost 100%. Theyโ€™re now pioneering another shift – moving 700,000 homes to induction cooking powered by their hydroelectric resources.

India continues its transformation, providing gas stoves to 95 million households since 2015. Yet affordability remains a barrier โ€“ 63% of families still use firewood. As Carlos noted, successful transitions require fuels that are “affordable, consistently and easily available.”

๐–๐ก๐ž๐ง ๐„๐ง๐ž๐ซ๐ ๐ฒ ๐“๐ซ๐š๐ง๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ ๐†๐ž๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐œ๐š๐ฅ

I was home in California recently, where the gas-to-electric transition has become politically charged. When Berkeley attempted to ban natural gas in new buildings, restaurant groups pushed back with lawsuits, forcing a reversal of the policy.

๐“๐ก๐ž ๐‡๐ž๐š๐ฅ๐ญ๐ก ๐ƒ๐ข๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง

Around 2.5 billion people worldwide still use fuels like firewood and charcoal, resulting in ~2 mln premature deaths each year from the air pollution consequences. This accounts for about 7-10% of all deaths in low and middle income countries.

I was surprised to discover that gas cooking, though cleaner than wood, still produces indoor air pollution. ย Meanwhile Induction cooking is dramatically more efficient than gas. Apparently I need to get past my aversion to an electric stove.

๐‚๐ฅ๐ข๐ฆ๐š๐ญ๐ž ๐‚๐ก๐š๐ง๐ ๐ž, ๐–๐ข๐ฅ๐๐Ÿ๐ข๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ, ๐š๐ง๐ ๐”๐ซ๐›๐š๐ง ๐‡๐ž๐š๐ฅ๐ญ๐ก

Wildfire smoke in cities – increasingly frequent with climate change – significantly impacts urban public health.

Carlos’s research shows wildfire smoke can increase “asthma related emergency department visits by 50 – 200%.” When urban areas burn, we face “toxic swirls of messes” from burning “homes, cars, batteries, bicycles.” in the “wildland urban interface”. These create particularly dangerous conditions for nearby populations.

Back in Europe, we face parallel crises โ€“ last summerโ€™s Alexandroupolis fire burned 960 kmยฒ in Greece, releasing particulate matter that drifted as far as Cairo.

๐“๐ก๐ž ๐๐š๐ญ๐ก ๐…๐จ๐ซ๐ฐ๐š๐ซ๐

Iโ€™m left with three thoughts.

  1. Sequencing matters: Ecuadorโ€™s phased approach (woodโ†’gasโ†’electric) built public trust. But what sealed the deal were subsidies, affordability and easy, consistent supply.
  2. Framing the transition around health outcomes rather than carbon metrics can help resonate across divides.
  3. Urban wildfires demand new monitoring frameworks. Current air quality indices ignore benzene, lead, and lithium particles from burning cities.

Edie Lush

I am a communication trainer, broadcast and podcast journalist and events host based in London and available worldwide.

Say hello edie@edielush.com

Instagram

Twitter

Privacy Preference Center